# Initiative Ordinance FD: Funding for the Los Angeles Fire Department Through a One-Half Percent Sales Tax *measure · City of Los Angeles measure* — November 3, 2026 General Election (2026-11-03), Los Angeles County, California Research pack generated 2026-10-30T23:52:30+00:00 by ballotscope. Summaries are LLM-generated from the linked originals and may contain errors; check the originals before relying on anything. Sources span 2025-12-30 to 2026-10-05. ## Overview (as of 2026-10-28, from 16 sources) Initiative Ordinance FD, placed on the ballot by petition from the Los Angeles firefighters' union, would add a 0.5% citywide sales tax dedicated to the Los Angeles Fire Department [City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department]. The City Administrative Officer says it would raise the City's rate from 10.25% to 10.75% and generate roughly $345 million a year [City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)]. A Council budget motion cited a union projection of $324 million in the first year [Council File 26-0600-S1: Council motion on expedited LAFD hiring ahead of the sales tax measure]. The text puts the money in a special fund for LAFD 'core functions' such as staffing, vehicles, equipment, stations, communications and brush clearance. It creates an advisory five-member citizens' oversight committee and annual audits, requires fire station projects to use project labor agreements and pay prevailing wages, and has no sunset [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)]. Under its maintenance-of-effort rule, the City may not levy the tax in any year it funds LAFD below its prior ten-year average share of the discretionary budget [City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department]. Firefighters, LAFD Chief Jaime Moore, Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Traci Park support it. They argue LAFD has roughly the same number of firefighters as in the 1960s and response times near double the four-minute national standard [Fund LA Fire (Yes on Measure FD campaign site); 'We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department]. The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, the designated opponent, says sales taxes are already too high and the City should fund the department from its existing budget [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; Council File 26-1100-S8: Memorandum to file on ballot argument author designations (Aug. 4, 2026); City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)]. HJTA also objects that a citizen-initiated special tax can pass by simple majority, which its statewide Proposition 43 would end [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)]. The Los Angeles Police Protective League also opposes it, according to LAist [Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department]. The Council voted 14-0 in June 2026 to place it on the ballot. It needs a majority vote and could take effect as early as April 1, 2027 [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance; Measures Appearing on the Ballot, General Election November 3, 2026; Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department]. ### Record highlights - December 2025: the City Clerk approved the initiative petition for circulation (dated December 26, 2025 in a Council motion). [Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; Council File 26-0600-S1: Council motion on expedited LAFD hiring ahead of the sales tax measure] - January 15, 2026: United Firefighters of Los Angeles City launched signature gathering at Fire Station 58, with Councilwoman Traci Park and a supporting statement from Mayor Bass. ['We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD; Firefighters launch petition for half-cent sales tax increase to fund LAFD; LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements; Firefighters Lead the Effort to Secure LAFD Funding] - May 2026: firefighters delivered more than 225,000 signatures. The City Clerk's threshold was about 139,497 valid signatures. [L.A. firefighters haul 225,000 signatures in push for funding measure; Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department] - June 2026: the City Council voted 14-0 to submit the certified initiative to voters under Charter Section 452 and adopted the ballot resolution and an election ordinance (No. 188976). [Ordinance No. 188976 calling the special election on the LAFD sales tax initiative; Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance; Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department] - The Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee designated proponent David Riles and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association as ballot argument authors (memo dated August 4, 2026, recording a March 4, 2026 meeting). [Council File 26-1100-S8: Memorandum to file on ballot argument author designations (Aug. 4, 2026)] - A Council motion asked the CAO and Personnel Department to report on expedited LAFD hiring options in case the measure passes. [Council File 26-0600-S1: Council motion on expedited LAFD hiring ahead of the sales tax measure] ### Stated positions - The firefighters' campaign says LAFD is 'half the size needed to keep LA safe', has 106 stations compared with 112 in the 1960s, and responds in nearly double the national standard. [Fund LA Fire (Yes on Measure FD campaign site); Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - Mayor Karen Bass said in January 2026 that 'new revenue sources are needed' and that the initiative will help build out the LAFD. LAist reports she and Councilmember Park support it as of October 2026. ['We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD; LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements; Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department] - LAFD Chief Jaime Moore called the tax a 'game-changer' (January 2026) and signed the October 2026 ballot argument in favor. [Firefighters launch petition for half-cent sales tax increase to fund LAFD; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association recommends No, saying the City should fund the department from its existing budget and that the tax should need a two-thirds vote. [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - The Los Angeles Police Protective League opposes the measure because the tax has no end date and can fund only the LAFD, according to LAist. [Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department] ### Where sources disagree - Revenue estimates differ. The ballot question and the CAO say about $345 million a year, while a Council motion cites a union projection of $324 million in the first year. Supporters also projected about $9.86 billion by 2050. [Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; Council File 26-0600-S1: Council motion on expedited LAFD hiring ahead of the sales tax measure; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - Coverage from January to May 2026 describes the rate change as 9.75% to 10.25%. Later official and news sources describe it as 10.25% to 10.75%, after the County's Measure ER took effect. ['We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD; LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements; L.A. firefighters haul 225,000 signatures in push for funding measure; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Measure FD: Are LA voters willing to pay more in sales tax to fund fire department?] - Reported signature thresholds differ: about 154,000 in January 2026 coverage, versus nearly 140,000 or about 139,497 in other reports. [Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; 'We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD; LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements; L.A. firefighters haul 225,000 signatures in push for funding measure] - HJTA's ballot argument cites more than $8.1 billion in General Fund revenue, while its voting guide refers to a budget of about $15 billion. These appear to be different budget measures. [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] ### Gaps - No standalone CAO or Controller fiscal report was found beyond the CAO's financial impact statement in the voter pamphlet. No analysis was found of how the maintenance-of-effort baseline would be calculated. - No independent verification of the response-time and staffing statistics cited by the firefighters was found among the sources. - No campaign finance amounts were found. LAist names major donors without figures. - No independent legal analysis was found of the state sales tax rate cap question, or of how Proposition 43 might interact with the measure. - Apart from the Police Protective League as reported by LAist, no statements were found from community, business or academic groups. ### Arguments for / praise - LAFD is understaffed and slow. More than 80% of calls are medical, and response times run nearly double the four-minute standard. The measure would fund at least 1,000 more firefighters and paramedics and faster 911 response. — *United Firefighters of Los Angeles City, LAFD firefighters signing the ballot argument, Fire Chief Jaime Moore* [Fund LA Fire (Yes on Measure FD campaign site); City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department] - City Hall has not adequately funded LAFD for decades under mayors and councils of every stripe, so a dedicated, locked fund is needed. — *LAFD firefighters signing the ballot argument and rebuttal* [City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements] - Accountability is built in: a special fund, independent annual audits, a citizens' oversight committee, and a maintenance-of-effort rule that bars collecting the tax if the City cuts LAFD's share of the budget. — *LAFD firefighters signing the ballot argument, Dave Riles* [LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - The cost is modest, a nickel on a $10 purchase, and LA's rate would still be below several neighboring cities. — *LAFD firefighters signing the rebuttal* [City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Measure FD: Are LA voters willing to pay more in sales tax to fund fire department?] - Wildfire risk is rising, and the measure funds brush clearance, wildfire prevention and modern firefighting aircraft. — *LAFD firefighters signing the ballot argument, Traci Park* [City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals); Firefighters launch petition for half-cent sales tax increase to fund LAFD] ### Arguments against / criticism - Sales taxes are already too high. FD would be the third increase in two years after the County's Measures A and ER, costing more than $86 per person or $345 for a family of four each year, and sales taxes fall hardest on lower-income residents. — *Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association* [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; 'We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - The City should fully fund the Fire Department from its existing General Fund (more than $8.1 billion), ahead of lower priorities such as homelessness spending and a $2.7 billion Convention Center upgrade. — *Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Jon Coupal* [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - As a special tax, it should need two-thirds voter approval. It can pass by simple majority only through a court-created 'loophole' for citizen initiatives, which Proposition 43 would close. — *Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association* [Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide; Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] - The tax has no end date and can be spent only on the LAFD, not other services or the police department. — *Los Angeles Police Protective League* [Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department] - The measure may raise questions about whether added state authorization is needed if it pushes the City over the 2% local sales tax cap. — *Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association* [Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle; City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals)] ## Text analysis (as of 2026-10-28) Coverage: Full text of the proposed initiative ordinance: Section 1 (name), Section 2 (new LAMC Article 1.20, Secs. 21.20.1-21.20.20), Section 3 (conflicting measures), Section 4 (effective and operative dates), Section 5 (legal defense) and Section 6 (codification). Read in the Council's ballot resolution attachment (S3) and checked against the voter pamphlet proof (S2), which also contains the impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement and arguments (not assessed as text). S1 is the countywide ballot-label list only. The state statutes the ordinance incorporates (Revenue and Taxation Code Parts 1, 1.6 and 1.7) were not reviewed. Drafting quality: **mixed**. Most of the tax machinery (Secs. 21.20.3-21.20.12) follows the standard state-administered transactions and use tax template, including the anti-injunction clause, and is routine. The measure-specific provisions are less precise. Spending is limited to LAFD 'core functions' but listed only as non-exclusive priorities. The maintenance-of-effort guarantee, which decides whether the tax can be collected in a given year, depends on an undefined 'total discretionary budget' measure and does not say how a tax collected by the state would be switched off for a fiscal year. The oversight committee is advisory, and its reports are subject to approval by the officials it oversees. The measure also includes strong entrenchment and litigation provisions (limits on Council amendment, and proponent standing with fee indemnification), a conflicting-measures clause that addresses only other City measures on the same ballot, and a few template leftovers. Overall it is workable but leaves high-stakes terms open to interpretation. - **ambiguity** (high, Sec. 21.20.19(A)-(B)): Whether the City may levy the tax at all in a given year depends on this baseline, but 'total discretionary budget funding' is not defined. Which funds count as discretionary, whether pension and benefit costs budgeted elsewhere count as LAFD funding, and whether the test uses adopted budgets or actual spending all change the result. The baseline is also a percentage, not a dollar floor, so LAFD's General Fund dollars could fall in a downturn while the City still complies. — "the City shall maintain, at a minimum, the average percentage of total discretionary budget funding to the LAFD during the ten fiscal years immediately preceding the operative date" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **gap** (medium, Sec. 21.20.19(B)): The penalty for missing the baseline is losing the tax for the fiscal year, but the text does not say who decides that the baseline was missed, when, or how a tax collected continuously by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration would be stopped and restarted. A shortfall found mid-year, or after the fact, has no stated consequence for revenue already collected. Subsection C requires only the City's own annual self-certification. — "the City shall not impose and levy the special tax established pursuant to this Ordinance during that fiscal year" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **expansive language** (medium, Sec. 21.20.13(A)): Spending is limited to the LAFD, but within the department the listed uses are examples, not limits, and 'core functions' is not defined. Any LAFD expense that can be described as supporting core functions appears allowed, including salaries and benefits for existing positions. Combined with the advisory-only oversight, this leaves wide discretion within the department. — "All revenues generated by the special tax shall be used for purposes that support the core functions of the LAFD, including, but not limited to these priorities" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **enforcement** (medium, Sec. 21.20.14(C), (G)): The committee is advisory only, reviews only the new tax revenue, and has no role in checking the maintenance-of-effort baseline. Its procedures, bylaws, reports and audits are all subject to approval by the City Council and Mayor, the officials whose spending it monitors. The text does not say what happens if the Council or Mayor declines to approve a report. — "Citizens’ oversight committee reports and audits are subject to review and approval of the City Council and Mayor." [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **special clause** (medium, Sec. 21.20.18): The Council may amend the ordinance without a public vote only if the change is strictly necessary to implement it, does not alter the amount, rate or duration of the tax, furthers its purposes, and passes by a two-thirds vote after 30 days' notice. All four conditions apply. Limits like these are common in initiative tax measures, but they lock in the spending categories, the maintenance-of-effort formula and the committee structure unless voters change them. — "The City Council shall have no authority to amend this Ordinance except as expressly provided herein." [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **special clause** (medium, Section 5): If the City does not defend the ordinance or appeal a loss, the proponents may defend it as agents of the People and the City must pay their reasonable attorneys' fees. This gives the proponents legal standing and shifts their litigation costs to the City. The text sets no cap on fees and no conditions on the proponents' litigation choices. — "shall be empowered by the People through this Ordinance to act as agents of the People of the City, and the City shall indemnify the proponent(s) for reasonable attorneys’ fees" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **other** (medium, Section 3): The conflict rule covers only another City measure on the same ballot whose tax would push the combined rate past the Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7251.1 limit. It does not address what happens if the rate cap is exceeded because of existing or future county or regional taxes. The ordinance relies on Section 7285.91 as its specific authority (Sec. 21.20.2(B)), and the operative date applies 'or as otherwise provided by law'. Whether those provisions fully authorize the 0.5% rate is a legal question the text does not settle. — "This measure is intended to operate within the limitations of state law governing transactions and use taxes." [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **duration** (medium, Sec. 21.20.16; Sec. 21.20.14(H)): The tax has no sunset. The oversight committee, by contrast, can be disbanded by the Council with the Mayor's approval after its first 10 years, so permanent taxing authority could outlast the oversight body created with it. — "The authority to levy the tax imposed by this Ordinance shall remain in effect until repealed by the voters." [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **beneficiary** (low, Sec. 21.20.20(A)-(C)): Fire station construction and replacement funded by the tax must be done under the Department of Public Works Project Labor Agreement (or a Council-approved PLA) and pay prevailing wages. This benefits construction workers and the building trades unions party to those agreements, and generally raises project costs compared with open bidding without such terms. These requirements are common in City capital programs. — "Any fire station construction, rehabilitation, and replacement project receiving funding from this Ordinance shall constitute public works for which prevailing wages shall be paid" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **drafting error** (low, Sec. 21.20.14(B)): This sentence is worded as if it staggers the first terms, but it gives all five first appointees the same three-year term, and the text never states the term length for later appointees. It looks like a staggering provision with the stagger left out. — "Of the members of the committee first appointed, the members appointed by the Mayor, the LAFD Fire Chief, the City Controller, the City Administrative Officer and the Chair of the City Council Public Safety Committee shall be appointed for terms of three years." [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - **drafting error** (low, Sec. 21.20.8(B)(1)): The ordinance substitutes 'city' for 'state' in this phrase, but the next paragraph uses 'district', a term the ordinance never defines; it appears carried over from the district-tax template. The intent is clear from the rest of the section, and it follows the state model, so the practical effect is likely small. — "“A retailer engaged in business in the district” shall also include any retailer that" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - Beneficiary: The Los Angeles Fire Department: Receives a dedicated special fund from the 0.5% tax for staffing, vehicles, equipment, stations, communications and brush clearance, with unspent balances carried forward. — "Unexpended balances shall remain in the fund or account and shall continue to be available for authorized uses in subsequent fiscal years until fully expended." [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - Beneficiary: Construction workers and building trades unions party to the City's project labor agreements: Funded fire station construction and replacement must be done under the Public Works PLA or a Council-approved PLA, at prevailing wages. — "All new fire station construction and replacement fire station projects that receive funding from this Ordinance shall be subject to the operative City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Project Labor Agreement" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] - Beneficiary: The initiative's proponents: Granted standing to defend the ordinance if the City does not, with the City required to pay their reasonable attorneys' fees. — "this Ordinance’s proponent(s) shall be entitled to assert his, her, or their direct personal stake by defending this Ordinance’s validity" [Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance] Limitations: The analysis is limited to the ordinance text. The incorporated state sales and use tax law, Section 7285.91, and the City's budget data needed to test the maintenance-of-effort baseline were not reviewed. Whether a citizen-initiated special tax can pass by simple majority, and the effect of statewide Proposition 43 on the same ballot, are legal questions outside the text; the ordinance itself states a majority-vote basis (Sec. 21.20.2(B)). ## Timeline (newest first) - **2026-10-05** — Published: Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department (LAist) - **2026-10-05** — LAist voter guide published (LAist) - **2026-10-01** — Published: Measure FD: Are LA voters willing to pay more in sales tax to fund fire department? (NBC Los Angeles) - **2026-09-22** — Published: Measures Appearing on the Ballot, General Election November 3, 2026 (Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk) - **2026-09-11** — Published: City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals) (Los Angeles City Clerk) - **2026-08-04** — Published: Council File 26-1100-S8: Memorandum to file on ballot argument author designations (Aug. 4, 2026) (Los Angeles City Clerk) - **2026-06-15** — Published: Ordinance No. 188976 calling the special election on the LAFD sales tax initiative (Los Angeles City Clerk) - **2026-06-15** — Published: Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance (Los Angeles City Attorney / City Council) - **2026-06** — City Council voted 14-0 to place the measure on the ballot (LAist) - **2026-05-12** — Published: L.A. firefighters haul 225,000 signatures in push for funding measure (Hoodline) - **2026-05-12** — Firefighters delivered more than 225,000 signatures to the City Clerk (Hoodline) - **2026-03-27** — Published: Council File 26-0600-S1: Council motion on expedited LAFD hiring ahead of the sales tax measure (Los Angeles City Council) - **2026-03-04** — Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee approved ballot argument author designations (Los Angeles City Clerk) - **2026-01-23** — Published: Firefighters Lead the Effort to Secure LAFD Funding (City of Los Angeles) - **2026-01-17** — Published: LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements (ABC7) - **2026-01-15** — Published: 'We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD (NBC Los Angeles) - **2026-01-15** — UFLAC launched signature gathering at Fire Station 58 (NBC Los Angeles) - **2026-01-15** — Firefighters began signature-gathering campaign (ABC7) - **2026-01-15** — Published: Firefighters launch petition for half-cent sales tax increase to fund LAFD (Westside Current) - **2026-01-15** — UFLAC kicked off petition drive (Westside Current) - **2025-12-30** — Published: Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle (Firehouse) - **2025-12-26** — City Clerk approved the initiative petition for circulation (Los Angeles City Council) - **2025-12** — City Clerk approved draft initiative petition for circulation (Firehouse) ## Sources ### Los Angeles Measure FD: What to know about the proposed sales tax bump for the Fire Department - LAist · voter guide · published 2026-10-05 · stance: neutral - LAist's voter guide to Measure FD (updated October 15, 2026): what it does, the ballot wording, the maintenance-of-effort rule, supporters, opponents including the police union, campaign donors, and the CAO's $345 million estimate. - Raises the City rate from 10.25% to 10.75%; a nickel on a $10 purchase. - LAFD has about 3,400 firefighters in 106 stations, according to the union. - The Council voted 14-0 in June to place it on the ballot; it needs only a simple majority because it was proposed by petition. - If approved, the tax could start as early as April 1, 2027 and lasts until repealed by voters. - Opponents include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and the Los Angeles Police Protective League. - Major contributors include the California Community Foundation, Airbnb and JM Eagle. - Reference: Yes on FD campaign site - Reference: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide ### Measure FD: Are LA voters willing to pay more in sales tax to fund fire department? - NBC Los Angeles · news · published 2026-10-01 · stance: neutral - NBC Los Angeles explainer on Measure FD, describing the rate increase, the campaign's response-time ad, supporters, and the designated opponent. - Raises the rate from 10.25% to 10.75%; a $100 purchase would cost $110.75. - Supporters say it raises about $345 million a year. - A Yes campaign ad says response should take 4 minutes but takes 8 in LA. - Supporters note Burbank and Pasadena already have rates of 10.25% or more. ### Measures Appearing on the Ballot, General Election November 3, 2026 - Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk · official text · published 2026-09-22 · stance: not_applicable - The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's list of all measures on the November 3, 2026 ballot. For Initiative Ordinance FD it gives only the ballot question, the majority-vote threshold, and the names on the ballot arguments; it does not contain the ordinance text or analysis. - Lists Initiative Ordinance FD under City of Los Angeles measures requiring a majority (50%+1) vote. - Ballot question: a 0.5% sales tax for the LAFD, with annual audits and a citizens' oversight committee, generating about $345 million a year until ended by voters. - Supporters listed: LA City Firefighters; LAFD Chief Officers Association; CA Professional Firefighters; International Assn. of Fire Fighters. Opponent: Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. ### City of Los Angeles Initiative Ordinance FD: voter information pamphlet pages (ballot question, impartial summary, CAO financial impact statement, full text, arguments and rebuttals) - Los Angeles City Clerk · official text · published 2026-09-11 · stance: not_applicable - The City Clerk's voter information pamphlet pages for Initiative Ordinance FD (marked as printer's proofs and 'DRAFT'): the ballot question, the Chief Legislative Analyst's impartial summary, the City Administrative Officer's financial impact statement, the ballot digest, the full text of the initiative ordinance (new LAMC Article 1.20, Sections 21.20.1-21.20.20 plus Sections 3-6), the argument in favor by LAFD firefighters, the argument against by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, and both rebuttals. - Imposes a 0.50% transactions and use tax citywide, administered by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, with proceeds in a special fund used for LAFD 'core functions' including staffing, vehicles, equipment, stations, communications and brush clearance. - Creates a five-member advisory citizens' oversight committee appointed by the Mayor, Fire Chief, Controller, CAO and Public Safety Committee chair; it cannot be disbanded within the first 10 years. - Requires a maintenance of effort: the City must keep LAFD's share of the discretionary budget at the prior ten-year average, or it may not levy the tax that year. - The tax lasts until repealed by voters; Council may amend only under four conditions, including a two-thirds vote, and cannot alter the rate or duration. - Fire station construction and replacement funded by the tax must use the Public Works Project Labor Agreement and pay prevailing wages. - The CAO says the measure raises the City rate from 10.25% to 10.75% and generates roughly $345 million a year. - The opposing argument says the measure is a special tax passing by simple majority only because it is a citizens' initiative, a 'loophole' that Proposition 43 on the same ballot would close. ### Council File 26-1100-S8: Memorandum to file on ballot argument author designations (Aug. 4, 2026) - Los Angeles City Clerk · decision record · published 2026-08-04 · stance: not_applicable - City Clerk memorandum to file recording that the Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee, at a March 4, 2026 special meeting, approved designations of ballot argument authors for the LAFD sales tax measure. - Requests to author the argument in favor came from Councilmember Imelda Padilla and proponent David Riles; against, from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. - Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson designated David Riles (in favor) and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (against). - Committee vote: Harris-Dawson, Raman, Yaroslavsky and Lee yes; Soto-Martinez absent. ### Ordinance No. 188976 calling the special election on the LAFD sales tax initiative - Los Angeles City Clerk · decision record · published 2026-06-15 · stance: not_applicable - Ordinance No. 188976, the election ordinance calling a special election on November 3, 2026 for the initiative ordinance on funding the LAFD through a one-half percent sales tax. It is procedural and points to the ballot resolution for the full text. - Recites that the City Clerk presented a certified initiative petition and that the Council adopted a resolution under Charter Section 452. - Consolidates the special election with the General Municipal and State General Elections. - Majority of votes cast required. ### Council File 26-1100-S8: Ballot resolution with the text of the proposed initiative ordinance - Los Angeles City Attorney / City Council · official text · published 2026-06-15 · stance: not_applicable - The City Council's ballot resolution for Council File 26-1100-S8, submitting the certified LAFD sales tax initiative petition to voters on November 3, 2026 under City Charter Section 452, with the full text of the proposed initiative ordinance attached. The attached text matches the version in the voter pamphlet. - Says the City Clerk presented a certified initiative petition for funding the LAFD through a one-half percent sales tax. - Sets the vote requirement at a majority of the votes cast. - Fixes the ballot question, including 'generating approximately $345 million annually until ended by voters'. - Attaches the full initiative ordinance text: Article 1.20 (Secs. 21.20.1-21.20.20), conflicting-measures clause, effective and operative dates, legal defense by proponents, and codification. ### L.A. firefighters haul 225,000 signatures in push for funding measure - Hoodline · news · published 2026-05-12 · stance: neutral - Hoodline report on firefighters delivering more than 225,000 petition signatures to the City Clerk to qualify the LAFD sales tax initiative. - The City Clerk's threshold is about 139,497 valid signatures. - Supporters estimate about $345 million in the first year. - Critics, including the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, say sales taxes fall hardest on lower-income shoppers and raise legal questions about voter thresholds for citizen-initiated taxes. ### Council File 26-0600-S1: Council motion on expedited LAFD hiring ahead of the sales tax measure - Los Angeles City Council · decision record · published 2026-03-27 · stance: neutral - A City Council motion in the FY 2026-27 budget file (seconded by Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez) asking the CAO and Personnel Department to report on a framework for expedited LAFD sworn and civilian hiring in case the sales tax measure passes. - Says the City Clerk approved the petition for circulation on December 26, 2025. - Cites the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City projection that the measure will generate $324 million in its first year. - Asks for options including front-funding hiring, expanding Personnel Department capacity, apprenticeship-based deployment models, and moving hiring functions to departments. ### Firefighters Lead the Effort to Secure LAFD Funding - City of Los Angeles · news · published 2026-01-23 · stance: neutral - A short City of Los Angeles news item announcing that the LAFD and Councilwoman Traci Park kicked off the firefighter-led signature campaign for a half-cent sales tax for the LAFD at Fire Station No. 58. - Describes the tax as dedicated to building and maintaining fire stations and increasing staffing and equipment. - Says the campaign is led by LAFD firefighters, not City Hall, and needs signatures to qualify for the November 2026 ballot. ### LA City firefighters ask voters to support sales tax measure to fund department improvements - ABC7 · news · published 2026-01-17 · stance: neutral - ABC7 (City News Service) report on the firefighters' union launching its signature drive, summarizing the proposal, the maintenance-of-effort provision, and statements from supporters and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. - Proponents estimate at least $345 million in the first year. - Describes the maintenance-of-effort provision as preventing existing funding from being replaced. - Union says LA has fewer than one firefighter per 1,000 residents, about half of Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago, Boston and New York. - Notes that at the time a 10.25% rate would still be below several nearby cities at 10.5%. ### 'We need your help.' LA firefighters urge Angelenos to support half-cent sales tax for LAFD - NBC Los Angeles · news · published 2026-01-15 · stance: neutral - NBC Los Angeles report on the January 15, 2026 launch of the firefighters' union petition drive for the half-cent LAFD sales tax, with statements from union officials, Councilmember Traci Park, Mayor Karen Bass and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. - Supporters said the tax would raise at least $345 million in the first year. - Union officials said LAFD has the same number of firefighters as in the 1960s, with more calls and six fewer stations, and response times near eight minutes. - Reports LAFD had 42 fewer firefighters than in 2025. - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association criticized the tax and the court-created path for citizen initiatives to pass special taxes by majority vote. ### Firefighters launch petition for half-cent sales tax increase to fund LAFD - Westside Current · news · published 2026-01-15 · stance: neutral - Westside Current report on the UFLAC petition kickoff, with quotes from union leaders, LAFD Chief Jaime Moore, Councilwoman Traci Park and Assemblyman Nick Shultz, and a reader comment section largely opposed to new taxes. - Reports LAFD's budget rose from $558 million in 2014 to $819 million in 2025, about 98% from the General Fund. - Chief Moore called the tax a 'game-changer' but said revenue and station work will take time. - Supporters said the measure keeps existing General Fund support while adding sales tax revenue. ### Proposed Los Angeles Fire Department Sales Tax Clears First Hurdle - Firehouse · news · published 2025-12-30 · stance: neutral - Firehouse trade-press report that the City Clerk approved the draft initiative petition for a half-cent LAFD sales tax, allowing signature gathering, with supporter projections and Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association criticism. - Supporters project about $9.86 billion by 2050, funding more than 1,000 additional firefighters and at least 30 new stations. - Nearly 140,000 valid signatures needed within 120 days. - HJTA called it a 'citizens' initiative tax increase' using a court-created loophole and questioned whether state authorization is needed if it exceeds the 2% local sales tax cap. ### Fund LA Fire (Yes on Measure FD campaign site) - United Firefighters of Los Angeles City (Yes on FD campaign) · position statement · published undated · stance: support - The Yes on Measure FD campaign site run by LAFD firefighters, presenting the case for the tax: response times, station counts, wildfire preparedness and a response-time map tool. - Says national standards call for an AED within 4 minutes of a medical emergency and 28 firefighters within 8 minutes of a medium-hazard fire, and that LAFD times are nearly double. - Says more than 80% of LAFD 911 calls are medical emergencies. - Says LAFD had 112 stations in the 1960s and has 106 today. ### Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association 2026 voting guide - Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association · third party analysis · published undated · stance: oppose - The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association's 2026 voting guide. Most of it covers statewide propositions; its City of Los Angeles entry recommends a No vote on Measure FD. - HJTA opposes FD because the city sales tax already rose to 10.25% with Measure ER and the Council and Mayor should fund the department from an existing budget of about $15 billion. - HJTA says FD is a special tax that should need a two-thirds vote but can pass by simple majority as a citizens' initiative, and that its Proposition 43 would close that loophole starting in January. ## Suggested use Ask me neutral questions about this subject using the material above. Distinguish what the sources say from your own background knowledge, cite the source titles you rely on, and say when information may be out of date given the dates shown.